A tenant screening report is a consumer report about a rental applicant, and a landlord who orders one takes on FCRA duties in the same way an employer does. What the report contains, how reliable each part of it is, and what you owe the applicant when it decides the answer are three separate things worth understanding before the first application arrives.
What is in the report
Typically an identity and address trace, a credit report or a screening score derived from one, a criminal records search, an eviction records search drawn from civil court filings, and sometimes previous landlord or income verification. Providers package these differently and the scoring models are proprietary, so two reports on the same applicant from two providers can reach different recommendations. The recommendation is the provider's opinion; the decision is yours, and your written criteria are what you will be judged against.
Eviction records are the weakest part
Eviction data comes from civil court filings, and a filing is not an outcome. A case that was dismissed, settled or decided in the tenant's favour can appear in the record as an eviction filing, and matching by name alone produces mismatches at a rate the CFPB has publicly criticised. Treat an eviction entry as something to ask the applicant about rather than as a decided fact, and check whether the record shows a disposition at all. Several states now restrict the reporting of sealed or older eviction records.
What you owe the applicant
If you decline the applicant, require a higher deposit, require a guarantor or offer different terms because of something in the report, that is adverse action under the FCRA. You must give the applicant notice, identify the consumer reporting agency that supplied the report, state that the agency did not make the decision, and tell them they may obtain a free copy of the report and dispute inaccurate information. Landlords miss this far more often than employers do, and it is a straightforward obligation to meet.
Criminal records need care in housing
HUD's guidance on criminal records in housing is that a blanket policy of refusing anybody with any record risks a disparate impact violation of the Fair Housing Act. The expectation is an individualised look at what the record was, how long ago, and its relevance to tenancy, applied consistently across applicants. Written criteria applied the same way to everybody are both the strongest defence and the fastest way to make decisions, which is why the checklist should exist before the first application rather than after the first difficult one.
Questions people ask about tenant screening reports
What does a tenant background check show?
Usually identity and address history, credit information or a derived score, criminal records, and eviction filings from civil courts, sometimes with income or previous landlord verification.
Are eviction records reliable?
They are the weakest element. A filing is not an outcome, dismissed and settled cases appear, and name-based matching produces mismatches. Treat an entry as a question for the applicant rather than a decided fact.
What do I owe an applicant I reject?
An adverse action notice identifying the reporting agency, stating it did not make the decision, and telling the applicant they may obtain a free copy and dispute it. That applies to a higher deposit or a guarantor requirement too.
Can I refuse anyone with a criminal record?
A blanket ban risks a Fair Housing Act disparate impact problem. HUD guidance expects an individualised assessment of what, when and relevance, applied consistently.