Eviction records are the least reliable part of a tenant screening report and the part landlords weight most heavily. They come from civil court filings, they frequently lack an outcome, and name-based matching produces mismatches that the CFPB has publicly criticised. This page covers where to look, how to read what you find, and what you owe the applicant if it changes your decision.
Where the records actually are
Eviction proceedings are civil cases filed in local courts, so the primary record sits with the court that heard the case. Tenant screening companies buy or collect this data and package it into reports, which is how most landlords encounter it. You can also search a local court's own records directly, which is slower but returns what the court actually holds, including the disposition. If a screening report shows an eviction that matters to your decision, checking the court record directly is worth the time.
A filing is not an outcome
This is the central problem. A case appears in the record when it is filed, and a great many filings end in dismissal, settlement, or judgment for the tenant. Commercial eviction data frequently carries the filing without the disposition, so a report can show an eviction against somebody who won. Sealed and expunged cases sometimes persist too. Treat an entry as a question rather than a fact, and read the disposition field before anything else, exactly as you would on a criminal record.
Identity matching is weak here
Eviction data is often matched on name alone, without the date of birth or address history that criminal searching uses, because the court filing itself may contain little more than a name. That produces false matches at a rate high enough that the CFPB has criticised the practice publicly. If an applicant tells you the record is not theirs, that is a plausible claim and worth checking against the court record rather than dismissing.
What you owe the applicant
If you decline the applicant, raise the deposit, require a guarantor or offer different terms because of a report, that is adverse action under the FCRA. You must give notice, identify the consumer reporting agency that supplied the report, state that the agency did not make the decision, and tell the applicant they may obtain a free copy and dispute inaccurate information. Given how often eviction records are wrong, that dispute route is doing real work, and skipping the notice is both unlawful and how errors stay in the system.
Questions people ask about how to check for evictions
Where do eviction records come from?
Civil court filings. Screening companies collect and package that data, but the authoritative record is the court's own, which is also where you will find the disposition.
Does an eviction record mean the tenant lost?
No. A case enters the record when it is filed, and many end in dismissal, settlement or judgment for the tenant. Commercial data often carries the filing without the outcome.
Can eviction records be wrong?
Frequently. Matching is often on name alone because the filing contains little else, which produces false matches at a rate the CFPB has criticised publicly. An applicant saying it is not theirs is a plausible claim.
What must I tell an applicant I reject over an eviction?
An adverse action notice identifying the reporting agency, stating it did not make the decision, and telling them they may get a free copy of the report and dispute it. That applies to a higher deposit or guarantor requirement too.